Golap Ch.Sahoo v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Odisha dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution following the petitioner's counsel's failure to appear after a stay order was vacated.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; interim order dated 22.07.2014 vacated.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.13136 of 2014
Golap Chandra Sahoo
…. Petitioner
Mr. G. Mukherji, Sr. Advocate -Versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties
Ms. S. Mishra, ASC
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
Order No. 06.07.2023
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no
instruction in the matter.
2. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-
prosecution.
3. Interim order passed by this Court dated 22 nd July, 2014 is
hereby vacated.
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Balaram Judge
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Golap Chandra Sahoo
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
R.K. Pattanaik
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court