The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition as infructuous on the submission that the dispute between the petitioner and the bank had been settled.
The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous and the interim order stood vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.1139 of 2015
Gitanjali Kahali …. Petitioner
Mr. P.K. Samantaray, Adv.
-versus-
…. Bank of India, Keonjhar and Opp. Parties Anr.
Mr. Tuna Sahoo, Adv. Along with Mr. Sandip Kumar Mishra, Adv.
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI Order ORDER No. 13.04.2023 05. 1 . This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2 . Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that as the dispute between the Petitioner and the Bank has been settled in the meantime, this Writ Petition has become infructuous.
3 . In such view of the matter, this Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous. 4 . Interim order passed earlier stands vacated.
( Dr. S.K. Panigrahi) Judge
B.Jhankar
Page 1 of 1
Gitanjali Kahali
Bank of India, Keonjhar and Opp. Parties Anr.
S.K. Panigrahi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
