Kanakalata Sahoo v. State of Orissa
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WPCRL No.5…
What did the court decide?
Dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPCRL No.5 of 2018
Kanakalata Sahoo …. Petitioner
Mr. R. Mohanty, Advocate.
- versus -
State of Odisha others …. Opp. Parties
Mr. G. R. Mohapatra,
Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
ORDER
Order No.
12.04.2023
4. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement.
2. None appears for the petitioner at the time of call.
Earlier on 21 st March 2023, also none appeared on her behalf.
3. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to pursue
this matter.
4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for default.
(Dr. S.K. Panigrahi) Judge
amit
Kanakalata Sahoo
State of Odisha
S.K. Panigrahi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court