In this writ appeal, the High Court set aside an impugned order passed by the Single Judge without hearing the appellant. The matter was remanded to the Roster Bench for disposal of pleadings and hearing by a specified date.
Impugned order set aside; writ petition remanded to Single Judge for completion of pleadings and hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.A. No. 37 of 2022
State of Odisha and another
…. Appellants
Mr. M.K. Khuntia
Additional Government Advocate
-versus-
Balaram Mallik
…. Respondent
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
Order No.
ORDER 27.03.2023
Page 1 of 2
will telephonically inform the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent herein, i.e., the writ Petitioner to remain present before the learned Single Judge on that date. The learned counsel for the State will of course remain present before the learned Single Judge on that date.
to be listed before the learned Single Judge in the Roster Bench on 17th July, 2023.
S. Behera
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to set aside the impugned order passed without hearing the appellant.
Whether to remand the writ petition to the Single Judge for completion of pleadings.
State of Odisha and another
Balaram Mallik
G. Satapathy
S. Behera
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
