RPFAM No. 46 of 2014 was dismissed as infructuous. An interim order dated 22nd October 2014 was vacated. The court did not address the merits of the original suit for debt recovery.
RPFAM dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No. 46 OF 2014
Gopal Chandra Jena
…. Petitioner Mr. Niranjan Lenka, Advocate
-versus-
Pranati Jena and another
…. Opp. Parties Ms. Tapaswini Sinha, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
24.02.2023
learned Judge, Family Court, Kendrapara in Cr.P. (Ex.) No.65 of 2009/615 of 2013 is under challenge in this RPFAM, whereby D.W. and Conditional N.B.W. of arrest was issued against the Petitioner for realisation of Rs.75,863/-.
ms
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Page 1 of 1
Gopal Chandra Jena
Pranati Jena
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
