The High Court of Orissa dismissed a revision petition against an order granting maintenance through compromise, holding that such an RPFAM is not maintainable.
RPFAM No.158 of 2014 is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No. 158 of 2014
Tarini Charan Dakua
…. Petitioner
Mr.Gopal Krishna Nayak, Advocate
-versus-
Laxmipriya Dakua @ Behera
…. Opp. Party
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
23.02.2023
learned Judge, Family Court, Phulbani passed in Criminal Proceeding No.12 of 2014 is under challenge in this RPFAM, whereby learned Judge, Family Court recorded the finding that the Petitioner agreed to pay Rs.2,000/- per month towards maintenance to the Opposite Party from the date of filing the application, i.e., 31st January, 2014.
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
s.s.satapathy
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an RPFAM is maintainable when the impugned order was passed by compromise.
Tarini Charan Dakua
Laxmipriya Dakua @ Behera
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
