The High Court dismissed a revision petition challenging a Family Court order directing monthly maintenance payment of Rs. 1,000. The petition was dismissed because the delay condonation application was rejected due to 31 days' uncondoned lapse.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM No. 224 OF 2017
Ashok Khandayatray
…. Petitioner
Mr. Pratyush Ranjan Parida, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ashok Kumar Mohapatra, Advocate
-versus-
Subrat Kumar Khandayatray
…. Opp. Party
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
21.04.2023
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
ms
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the request for condonation of delay in filing revision is maintainable given the 31-day lapse.
Whether the revision petition challenging the Family Court's maintenance order survives given the dismissal of the delay condonation.
Ashok Khandayatray
Subrat Kumar Khandayatray
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
