The High Court of Orissa dismissed the revision petition as infructuous on the sole ground that the petitioner's counsel successfully submitted that the matter had become infructuous.
The revision petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM No. 139 OF 2015
Dinesh Kumar Pati @ Dinesh Pati …. Petitioner Mr. M.R. Baug, Advocate
-versus-
…. Opp. Parties Ms. Ashwariya Dash, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Arijeet Mishra, Advocate
Anusaya Pati and others
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
10.04.2023
(K.R. Mohapatra)
ms
Judge
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present revision petition is maintainable given the submission that the matter has become infructuous.
Dinesh Kumar Pati
Anusaya Pati and others
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
