Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Mazdoor and Employee Vs State — Service and Employment | Orissa HC (2023)

Home
Orissa HC
2023
Mazdoor and Employee Vs StateMazdoor and Employee v. State

Disposed

Mazdoor and Employee v. State

Orissa HC6 Apr 2023OJC/282/2002

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition. Counsel stated lack of instructions. Court disposed of the petition accordingly.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

OJC No.282 of 2002

The Mazdoor and the Employees United Union of Upper Kolab Project, Koraput

….. Petitioner

Mr. A.K. Mohapatra-1, Advocate

Vs.

State of Odisha & Others

Opposite Parties

State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMAN

ORDER

06.04.2023

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
The Mazdoor and the Employees United Union of Upper Kolab Project, Koraput
respondent
State of Odisha

Coram

AI extract

B.R. Sarangi

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 6 Apr 2023 · April
Registered: 9 Jan 2002
Case no.: OJC/282/2002

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from B.r.sarangi Murahari Sri Raman

Kamal Kapoor Vs State
5 Apr 2023
Mandaradhar Boitai Vs Member Secy.,Cadre
5 Apr 2023
Tusar R. Mishra Vs State
5 Apr 2023
Pradeepta Kumar Mohanty Vs State of Odisha
6 Apr 2023

Cite this judgement

Mazdoor and Employee v. State, OJC/282/2002 (OD), decided on 6 April 2023.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

B.R. Sarangi and M.S. Raman

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Disposed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The writ petition was disposed of on account of the absence of instructions from the learned counsel for the petitioner.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 04. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he has no instructions in the matter.

In view of the above submission, this writ petition stands disposed of for want of instructions.

(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(M.S. RAMAN)
JUDGE

Laxmikant

Page 1 of 1

M.S. Raman

CNR

ODHC010000862002

Topic

Service and Employment

Bench

B.r.sarangi Murahari Sri Raman

Disposal

Disposed Off

Upendra Bariha Vs Chief Managing Director, Mcl

6 Apr 2023

Sarat Ku.Behera Vs Director-Cum-Addl.Se

6 Apr 2023