The High Court of Orissa disposed of a writ petition without expressing an opinion on merits but directed Opposite Party No.2 to consider the petitioner's representation and pass an order within three months.
Direction to Opposite Party No.2 to consider petitioner's representation and pass appropriate order within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
`IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.23716 of 2019
Upendra Bariha
….. Petitioner Mr. R.N. Prusty, Advocate
Vs.
Chief Managing Director, MCL & ….. Opposite Parties others
Mr. Sudarshan Nanda, Advocate
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMAN
ORDER
06.04.2023
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 09.
Page 1 of 2
MRS
Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-7, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
(M.S. RAMAN)
JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant direction to the opposite party to consider the petitioner's representation under the Coal Bearing Areas (A&D) Act, 1957.
Upendra Bariha
Chief Managing Director, MCL
B.R. Sarangi
M.S. Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
