This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.415 of 2014
Sarat Kumar Behera
….. Petitioner Mr.Biswajit Parida, Advocate Vs.
The Director-cum-Addl. Secretary ….. Opposite Party to Govt. Municipal Administration Housing and Urban Development Department
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMAN
ORDER
06.04.2023
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 04. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the brief has been taken by the Client and, as such, he has no instruction in the matter.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (M.S. RAMAN) JUDGE
MRS
Sarat Kumar Behera
The Director-cum-Addl. Secretary
DR. B.R. SARANGI
MR. M.S. RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
