Bail application disposed of as infructuous. Counsel submitted that procedure under Section 41-A of Cr.P.C. was already followed, rendering the application futile.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.8074 of 2023
Lalu @ Sanjeeb Pratap Singh Deo …. Petitioners & another
Mr. K. Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
…. State of Odisha Opposite Party Mr. P.C. Das, A.S.C.
CORAM:
JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
08.09.2023
( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge
Anil
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: ANIL KUMAR SAHOO Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 18-Sep-2023 17:31:20
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the bail application rendered infructuous due to prior compliance with Section 41-A of Cr.P.C.
Whether to dispose of the bail application as infructuous based on the submission.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Section 41-A of Cr.P.C.Referred¶13
Lalu @ Sanjeeb Pratap Singh Deo
State of Odisha
A.K. MOHAPATRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
