Petitioner's bail application under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. declared infructuous after counsel submitted that Supreme Court guidelines in Arnesh Kumar were followed; application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.8072 of 2023
Swagat Biswal @ Papuni
…. Petitioner Mr. R.C. Maharana, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Mr. P.C. Das, A.S.C.
CORAM:
JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
08.09.2023
( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge
Anil
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: ANIL KUMAR SAHOO Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 18-Sep-2023 17:31:19
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Arnesh Kumar vs. State of BiharReferred¶1
Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar reported in AIR 2014 SC 2756 · Who else cites this
Swagat Biswal @ Papuni
State of Odisha
A.K. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
