Allowed

Sudhansu Naik@Sudha v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC12 Sept 2023ABLAPL/6332/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court heard an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. regarding an alleged offence under Section 364(A) IPC. Denying immediate anticipatory bail, the Court granted conditional bail upon the petitioners' surrender in the related General Record Case within three weeks, subject to antecedent verification.

What did the court decide?

Conditional bail granted upon surrender in G.R. Case No.1279 of 2022 within three weeks, subject to antecedent verification and attendance requirements.

Sudhansu Naik@Sudha Vs State of Odisha — Anticipatory Bail | Orissa HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

ABLAPL No.6332 of 2023

¶3

Sudhansu naik @ Sudha & another Petitioners

¶4

Mr.Anirudha Das, Advocate

¶5

-versus-

¶6

State of Odisha

¶7

…. Opposite Party Mr.P.C.Das, A.S.C.

¶8

CORAM: JUSTICE A.K.MOHAPATRA

ORDER

Order No.

12.09.2023

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State. Perused the records.

¶14

This is an application under Section 438, Cr.P.C. filed by the Petitioners for anticipatory bail, involving offence punishable under Section 364(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

Considering the seriousness of the allegation, gravity of the offence and the facts of the case, although I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioners, however it is observed that, in the event the Petitioners surrender and move for bail before the learned S.D.J.M., Angul in G.R.Case No.1279 of 2022 arising out of Angul P.S. Case No.661 of 2022 within a period of three weeks from today, they shall be released on bail on such terms and conditions as the learned Magistrate may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, but subject to verification of criminal

¶16

Page 1 of 2

¶17

// 2 //

¶18

antecedents of similar nature against the Petitioners. It is directed that the Petitioners shall not indulge in similar nature of offence while on bail and shall appear before the I.O. as and when required for the purpose of investigation. They shall also appear before the trial Court on each and every date of posting without fail.

¶19

The ABLAPL is disposed of accordingly.

¶20

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.

¶21

RKS

¶22

(A.K. Mohapatra)
Judge

¶23

Signature Not Verified

¶24

Page 2 of 2

¶25

Digitally Signed Signed by: RAMESH KUMAR SINGH Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 18-Sep-2023 16:48:31

Sudhansu Naik@Sudha v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudhansu Naik@Sudha v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satrughan Pradhan Vs State of Odisha

Narendra Kumar Sahoo Vs State of Odisha

Pravakar Gupta Vs State of Odisha

Surendra Naik Vs State of Odisha

Satyabrata Panda Vs State of Odisha

Debabrata Panda Vs State of Odisha