The High Court disposed of the bail application as infructuous because the learned counsel for the applicant submitted that bail under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. had already been granted, rendering the current application unnecessary.
Application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No. 8485 of 2023
Debabrata Panda
…. Petitioner
Mr. Sidhant Kumar Jena, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party Mr. A.P. Das, A.S.C.
CORAM: JUSTICE A.K.MOHAPATRA
ORDER
12.09.2023
Order No.
2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that procedure of Section 41-A of Cr. P.C. has already been followed, as such, the bail application has become infructuous.
3. In view of such submission, the ABLAPL is disposed of as infructuous.
(A.K. Mohapatra) Judge
Debasis
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: DEBASIS AECH Designation: Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: OHC CUTTACK Date: 15-Sep-2023 16:29:37
Debabrata Panda
State of Odisha
A.K. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
