The High Court dismissed WPCRL No.554 of 2012, quashing a petition filed by Bishnu Ch. Das, on the grounds that a withdrawal application had been admitted and the Vigilance Department offered no opposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPCRL No.554 of 2012
Bishnu Ch. Das
..……. Petitioner Mrs. A.K.Dei, Adv. -Versus-
State of Orissa & Others
.……... Opp. Parties
Mr. S. Das
Sr. Standing Counsel (Vig.)
CORAM: JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO ORDER 20.07.2022
Order No. 12.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode). 2. Mrs. A.K. Dei, learned counsel appears for the petitioner and submits that the memorandum of withdrawal has been filed. 3. Mr. S. Das, Senior Standing Counsel, Vigilance has projected no opposition.
4. In view of the above development, this petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(S. Talapatra)
Judge
(M.S. Sahoo) Rati Ranjan Judge
2
3
Bishnu Ch. Das
State of Orissa & Others
S. Talapatra
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
