High Court dismissed this Family Courts Act appeal wherein parties compromised during hearings. The court set aside the impugned divorce decree, annulled divorce effects, and deemed the marriage subsisted.
Impugned judgment and decree set aside; divorce effects annulled; marriage deemed subsisted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK MATA No.25 of 2020
Smt. Joshnarani Barad …… Appellant Mr. A.P. Bose, Advocate
-versus-
Chandra Sekhar Barad …… Respondent Mr. P.K. Nayak, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
ORDER 19.07.2022
Order No.
2
3
District: Sundargarh are set aside. All effects of the decree of divorce are annulled. As such, the marriage between the parties be deemed to have subsisted without any interruption.
(S. Talapatra)
Judge
(M.S. Sahoo)
Judge
Murmu
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal seeking reversal of divorce decree admitted on compromise is sustainable.
Whether the impugned divorce decree should be set aside on reconciliation.
Whether the decree effects should be annulled and marriage deemed subsisted.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Joshnarani Barad
Chandra Sekhar Barad
S. Talapatra
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
