The Court corrected a typographical error in the lower court's order dated 20.07.2022, changing the recorded date of marriage from 19.12.2016 to 09.12.2016. The registry was directed to update the original order.
The incorrect date 19.12.2016 was corrected to 09.12.2016 in the original order. Registry directed to update the records forthwith.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MATA No.163 of 2019
Pranaya Mohanty ….. ..… Appellant Mr. A. Mishra, Adv.
-Versus-
Mamata Pradhan
.……... Respondent Mr. A.P. Dash, Adv.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
ORDER
08.09.2022
I.A. No.194 of 2022
Order No.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).
2. Heard Mr. A. Mishra, learned counsel appearing for the applicant (the appellant).
3. Mr. Mishra, learned counsel has pointed out that a typographical error has crept in Para 9 of the order dated 20.07.2022 delivered in MATA No.163 of 2019.
4. In Para 9 of the said order, the following has been typed:
“9. in view of the above observation, the marriage which was solemnized on 19.12.2016 between the appellant and the opposite party stands dissolved.”
5. Mr. Mishra, learned counsel based on the record has submitted that date of marriage should be 09.12.2016 not 19.12.2016 as typed in the order.
2
6. It is apparent that it is mere a typographical mistake and as such we do not have any hesitation to correct that date by the date which has been referred as the date of marriage.
7. In Para 9, instead of ‘19.12.2016’, the following date shall be substituted: “09.12.2016”.
8. Thus, the said mistake stands corrected.
9. Registry is directed to correct in the original order, under the authorities of this order, forthwith.
10. That apart, a copy of this order shall form the part of the order dated 20.07.2022.
11. A copy of this order be supplied to the learned counsel for the appellant, free of cost.
(S. Talapatra)
Judge
(M.S. Sahoo) Judge
Rati Ranjan
3
4
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a typographical error in the date of marriage recorded in a previous order should be corrected.
How the lower court order dated 20.07.2022 in the instant matter should be rectified.
Whether the registry was directed to make the necessary correction in the original records.
Pranaya Mohanty
Mamata Pradhan
S. Talapatra
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
