Petitioner challenged orders related to a victim girl’s custody. Court found police rescued the girl and restored her to parents, making the petition infructuous. Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPCRL No.44 of 2022
Gouranga Sahoo
..……. Petitioner
Mr. Umakanta Sahoo, Adv. -Versus-
State of Odisha & others
..…….. Opp. Parties Mr. S.S. Kanungo, AGA CORAM:
JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
ORDER
02.08.2022
Order No.
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/ Physical Mode).
2. Mr. Umakanta Sahoo, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has confirmed that the Police has rescued the victim girl and restored the custody to her parents.
3. Mr. S.S. Kanungo, learned Addl. Government Advocate has placed the written instruction wherein the details of the recovery are narrated.
4. In view of the above development, this petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the same stands dismissed as infructuous.
(S. Talapatra) Judge
(M.S. Sahoo) Judge
Subhasis
2
3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous upon restoration of victim custody.
Gouranga Sahoo
State of Odisha
S. Talapatra
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
