The Court allowed an application to modify the mode of alimony payment from a term deposit to a demand draft in favor of the parties' son, who had attained majority, resolving technical impediments.
The lump-sum amount of Rs.10,00,000/- to be paid via demand draft to the son, Omkar Asutosh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK MATA No.57 of 2019
Dayanidhi Rayaguru …... Appellant Mr. H.K. Mund, Advocate
-versus-
Tanima Tripathy @ Rayguru …… Respondent Mr. S. Chakravarty, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
ORDER
29.11.2022
I.A. No.261 of 2022
Order No.
2
The payment of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees ten lakhs) be made by a demand draft in the name of their son, namely, Omkar Asutosh. The demand draft shall be submitted to the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court for handing over the same to their son, who has attained majority by 5th December, 2022.
(S. Talapatra) Judge
(M.S. Sahoo) Judge
Murmu
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the mode of alimony payment can be modified from a term deposit to a demand draft due to technical issues.
Dayanidhi Rayaguru
Tanima Tripathy @ Rayguru
S. Talapatra
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
