This order dismisses the appeal before this Court for non-prosecution as no representation was made by the appellant on the date of listing after a previous direction.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MATA NO.21 OF 2019
Kanakalata Mohanty
Appellant
None
-versus-
Sudhansu Sekhar Das
…. Respondent
Mr. P.K.Biswal, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA JUSTICE M.S.SAHOO
ORDER
Order No. 01.08.2022
11 .
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2 . Despite the order dated 11.07.2022 there is no representation from the appellant. In the said order, this Court had occasioned to observe that the matter be listed again on 01.08.2022. If on that day, there is no representation from the appellant, this Court will be persuaded to pass an order for non-prosecution.
3 . None appears for the appellant when the matter is called out.
4 . However, Mr. P.K.Biswal, learned counsel appears for the respondent.
5 . In this context, we have no alternative, but to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution. It is dismissed accordingly.
6 . LCRs, if received, be returned forthwith.
(S. Talapatra) Judge
(M.S. Sahoo)
Judge
Gs/Radha
Kanakalata Mohanty
Sudhansu Sekhar Das
S. Talapatra
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
