The High Court of Orissa disposed of a writ petition seeking protection and financial benefits for a retrospective joining date. The court permitted a fresh representation and directed the respondent to consider a specific prior judgment while deciding the claim.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.C(TAC) No.27 of 2016
Sanjay Kumar Das
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & others
…. Opposite Parties
COROM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER Order No 13.7.2022 1. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed with the following prayer: “ (i) to direct the Opp. parties to give apy protection to the petitioner on his joining on 25.10.1990, at Nampo High School, and give all the consequential, financial benefits accrued out of the same.”
4. Considering the nature of prayer made in the Writ Petition, the Petitioner is permitted to make a fresh representation before Opp. party No.3 within a period of three weeks days from today.
5. It is observed that if such a representation is filed by the Petitioner ventilating his grievances, the same shall be considered by Opp. party No.3 in accordance with law.
6. It is further directed that while taking a decision on the claim of the petitioner, the decision rendered by this Court on 27.7.2016 in OJC No.17506 of 1997 be taken into consideration.
The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of three
// 2 //
months. The order so passed by Opp. Party No.3 be
communicated to the Petitioner also.
7. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
sangita
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to protection and financial benefits for his joining on 25.10.1990 at Nampo High School.
What course of action the learned court directs the opposite party to take regarding the petitioner's grievance.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
OJC No.17506 of 1997Explained¶12
Sanjay Kumar Das
State of Odisha
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
