A writ petition challenging the non-regularisation of service and seeking regularisation with salary and benefits. The High Court reserved liberty for the petitioner to file a fresh representation to the respondent within three weeks.
Liberty granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before Opposite Party No. 2 within three weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C)(OAC) No.4419 of 2015
Jagabandhu Acharya
…. Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER 12.07.2022
Order No 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the Opposite Parties.
3. The Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition for the following reliefs.
“ In view of the facts and circumstances mentioned in the para 6 above, the applicant prays for the following reliefs:
// 2 //
And pass such other orders or directions as the Hon’ble Tribunal may deem just and proper.”
4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three weeks hence.
5. It is observed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid period, Opp. Party No.2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by the Opp. Party No.2 be communicated to the petitioner.
6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Sneha
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the non-regularisation of the petitioner|s service is illegal and whether he should be granted regularisation along with benefits?
Jagabandhu Acharya
State of Odisha
BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
