The Single Judge dismissed the writ petition as the petitioner could not demonstrate any instruction from his client, granting liberty for a fresh petition if a cause of action exists.
Liberty is granted to file a fresh petition if any cause of action still subsists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.C(OAC) No.92 of 2015
Sadasib Das
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
09.05.2022
Order No
1. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2 . Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he has
received no instruction from his client.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Subrat
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sadasib Das
State of Odisha
Biraj Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
