Sk Sajim v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition as the petitioner had received no instructions from his client, but granted liberty to file a fresh petition if a cause of action subsisted.
What did the court decide?
Liberty given to file a fresh petition if any cause of action still subsists.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.C(OAC) No.363 of 2015
Sk. Sajim
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
09.05.2022
Order No
1. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2 . Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he has
received no instruction from his client.
- Accordingly, the WPC (OAC) is dismissed. However, liberty is
given to the Petitioner that he may file a fresh petition, if any cause
of action still subsists.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Subrat
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sk. Sajim
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court