High Court of Orissa deemed the petitioner's application seeking recall of an order dated 06.05.2022 without merit due to lack of continuing cause of action and absence of legal representation, dismissing the plea.
The interim application seeking recall of the order dated 06.05.2022 was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C)(OAPC) No.109 of 2015
Basudev Mishra
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors.
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
20.02.2023
Order No
04. I.A. No. 56 of 2022
1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. None appeared for the Petitioner when the matter was called.
3. This Interim Application has been filed seeking recalling of order dtd.06.05.2022.
4. Since it is found that the order dtd.06.05.2022 has been passed on the ground that the learned counsel for the Petitioner has no instruction and liberty has been given to the Petitioner to file a fresh application, if any cause of action still subsists, this Court is not inclined to recall the order dtd.06.05.2022.
5. The I.A. is accordingly dismissed.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Sneha
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the interim application seeking recall of an order dated 06.05.2022 succeeds given the petitioner admitted lack of cause of action and absence of counsel.
Basudev Mishra
State of Odisha & Ors.
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
