The High Court of Orissa disposed of WPC No. 860 of 2015 as infructuous. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the underlying matter became infructuous during its pendency before the Administrative Tribunal, which is why the petition is now ended without a merits hearing.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC(OAC) No. 860 of 2015
Dr. Biswajit Barik
Petitioner
Miss Babita Kumari Pattnaik, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and another …. Opposite Parties Mr. T.K.Praharaj, SC
CORAM:
JUSTICE M.S.SAHOO
ORDER
Order No.
19.5.2022
1. 1. This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.
20.12.2021 after the Original Application was transferred upon abolition of the learned Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack.
(M.S.Sahoo) Judge
dutta
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of as infructuous given that the underlying matter is no longer pending.
Dr. Biswajit Barik
State of Odisha
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
