The petitioner's writ petition regarding pension benefits was disposed of as infructuous following the abolition of the Original Application and the Odisha Administrative Tribunal. No further proceedings were pursued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC(OAC) No. 859 of 2015
Dr. Bharat Chandra Sahoo
Petitioner
Miss Babita Kumari Pattnaik, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and another …. Opposite Parties Mr. T.K.Praharaj, SC
CORAM:
JUSTICE M.S.SAHOO
ORDER
Order No.
19.5.2022
1. 1. This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.
20.12.2021 after the Original Application was transferred upon abolition of the learned Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack.
(M.S.Sahoo) Judge
dutta
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of as infructuous after the abolition of the Tribunal.
Dr. Bharat Chandra Sahoo
State of Odisha
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
