The High Court disposed of the writ petition due to the petitioner's lack of up-to-date instruction to pursue the matter regarding a departmental posting order.
Liberty to revive the petition within sixty days for any surviving cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC(OAC) No. 3786 of 2013
Abhiram Dash
Petitioner
Mr. A.K. Mohanty-A, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & others …. Opp. Parties
Mr. R.N. Mishra, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO
ORDER Order No. 19.05.2022
“When the matter was taken up on 04.03.2022, time was granted to the petitioner for obtaining instruction.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be granted further some time to obtain instruction.
RJ
It is submitted by the learned Addl. Government Advocate that considering the nature of grievance raised in the writ petition nothing would survive for adjudication, more so, for the fact that the petitioner would have retired in the year 2020 on attaining the age of superannuation and for the fact that the challenge is to a order of
// 2 //
deployment dated 01.07.2013 posting the petitioner at a particular place.
To grant another opportunity to the petitioner, list this matter on 19.05.2022.”
(M.S. Sahoo)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
Abhiram Dash
State of Odisha
M.S. Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
