Subhalaxmi Sethy v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's writ petition dismissed due to lack of instructions from client; liberty granted to file fresh petition if cause of action subsists.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.C(OA) No.1525 of 2015
Subhalaxmi Sethy …. Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
11.07.2022
Order No
2. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2 . Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he has
received no instruction from his client.
3. Accordingly, the WPC (OAC) is dismissed. However, liberty is
given to the Petitioner that he may file a fresh petition, if any cause
of action still subsists.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Subrat
Subhalaxmi Sethy
State of Odisha
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court