Smitamanjari Mallik v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
Order dismissing Writ Petition due to lack of instruction from petitioner's counsel, with a rider allowing for revival.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC(OAC) NO.3112 OF 2013
Smitamanjari Mallik
Petitioner
Mr.J.Mishra, Adv.
-versus-
State of Orissa & ors. …. Opposite Party(s)
Mr.R.P.Mohapatra, AGA
CORAM:
JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
16.3.2022
Order No.
01. 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he has no
instruction in the matter.
2. In the circumstance, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for
no instruction but however with a rider of revival.
(Biswanath Rath)
Judge
M.K.Rout
Page 1 of 1
Smitamanjari Mallik
State of Orissa
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court