Dismissed
Harish Chandra Samal v. State of Odisha
Orissa HCWPC(OAC)/3073/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WPC(OAC) No.3073 of 2013
Harish Chandra Samal
…. Petitioner(s)
Mr. D.K. Mohapatra, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha
…. Opposite Party(s) Mr. S.P. Panda, Addl. Govt. Adv.
CORAM:
JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH ORDER 14.03.2022
Order No.
1. It is submitted by the learned counsel for Petitioner that he has no instruction in the matter. It is at this stage of the matter, on instruction Mr. Panda, learned Addl. Govt. Adv. submitted that not only the Petitioner has been dismissed from service on closure of the disciplinary proceeding on 28.12.2013, but in the meantime he has also been convicted in the criminal proceeding vide Vigilance Case No.17 of 2013.
2. This WPC(OAC) stands dismissed for no instruction, but however, with recording of the above statement of Mr. Panda, learned State Counsel.
(Biswanath Rath) Judge
A.K. Jena
Page 1 of 1
Harish Chandra Samal
State of Odisha
Biswanath Rath
A. K. Jena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court