In this writ petition under Article 226, the petitioner appeared with no counsel. The High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution, noting it had been pending since 2013 and the petitioner appeared to have no interest.
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WPC(OAC) No.3068 of 2013
Kunal Kumar Gouda …. Petitioner(s) None -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party(s) Mr. U.K. Sahoo, Addl. Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
14.03.2022
Order No.
01. 1. None appears on behalf of the Petitioner at the time of call.
2. This matter is pending since 2013. It appears, the Petitioner
has no interest in the matter.
3. This writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-
prosecution.
(Biswanath Rath)
Judge
A.K. Jena
Page 1 of 1
Kunal Kumar Gouda
State of Odisha
Biswanath Rath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
