The High Court of Orissa, without expressing an opinion on the merits, directed the opposite party to consider the petitioner's representation on pensionary benefits and dispose of it within three months.
Direction to opposite party to consider the representation filed by the petitioner and pass appropriate order within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OAC) No. 2653 of 2013
Padmini Mallick
Petitioner Mr. T.P. Tripathy, Advocate
Vs.
State of Orissa and others …..
Opposite parties
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
09.12.2022
01
Arun
(DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be directed to obtain a decision on its representation filed with the opposite party within a stipulated time.
Padmini Mallick
State of Orissa
DR. B.R. SARANGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
