The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging a 2013 advertisement. The court found that due to the passage of time, the petition became infructuous and was disposed of without relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OAC) No. 2867 of 2013
Sudharani Biswal
….. Petitioner
Mr. L.P. Dwibedi, Advocate
Vs.
….. State of Odisha and others Opposite Parties
Mr. S. N. Nayak, ASC
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
08.12.2022
Arun (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous due to efflux of time regarding an advertisement from 2013.
Sudharani Biswal
State of Odisha
Dr. Justice B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
