A writ petition filed by a former Principal seeking reinstatement after termination. The court held, without expressing an opinion on merits, that the administration must decide and act upon the petitioner's representation within three months.
Direction to opposite party no.4 to decide on the petitioner's representation within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No. 27995 of 2022
Sailendra pattnaik …. Petitioner Mr. S. Pattnaik (in person)
-Versus -
State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opp. Parties State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
Order No.
03
ORDER 09.12.2022 This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Page 1 of 2
Annexure-1 series and pass appropriate order in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order by the petitioner.
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi) Judge
Alok
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be reinstated in the post of Principal at UCPS, Tirtol by setting aside his termination order.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sailendra Pattnaik
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
