Dusmanta Kumar Nayak v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge, in an order taken up via Hybrid Mode, disposed of the writ petition dated 05.08.2022 as infructuous based on the counsel's submission regarding efflux of time.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC(OAS) No.60 of 2016
Dusmanta Kumar Nayak ….
Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
05.08.2022
Order No
02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2 . Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that by
efflux of time, the matter has become infructuous.
3. In view of such submission, the Writ Petition stands
disposed of as infructuous.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Subrat
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dusmanta Kumar Nayak
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court