Jagamoha Pradhan v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Orissa, Cuttack, dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear.
The High Court of Orissa, Cuttack, dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.C(OAS) No.63 of 2016
Jagamoha Pradhan
…. Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
05.08.2022
Order No
2. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2 . None appears for the Petitioner, when the matter is called out
today.
3. Accordingly, the WPC (OAS) is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Subrat
Jagamoha Pradhan
State of Odisha
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court