Disposed
Sradhanjali Ray v. State of Odisha
Orissa HCWPC(OAC)/124/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WPC (OAC)…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OAC) No.124 OF 2013
Sradhanjali Ray …..
Petitioner
Mr. B.S. Tripathy-1, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha & Ors. ….. Opposite parties
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
23.02.2022
Order No. 1
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2
Court directs the petitioner to file a fresh representation within a period of fifteen days from today ventilating his grievances before opposite party no.3. In the event, the petitioner files such representation along with this order, opposite party no.3 shall consider and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three months thereafter.
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
Alok
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to quash a communication regarding promotion and direction opposite party to maintain petitioner's promotion to Level-III with consequential benefits.
Sradhanjali Ray
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court