The High Court of Orissa, without expressing an opinion on merits, disposed of the writ petition by directing the State Department to consider the petitioner's representation regarding seniority and gradation within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OA) No.985 OF 2013
Biswanath Padhy
Petitioner
Mr. S. Rath, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha & Ors. ….. Opposite parties
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER 23.02.2022
Order No. 1
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2
petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to opposite party no.1 vide Annexure-4 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned State Counsel has no objection.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
Alok
Biswanath Padhy
State of Odisha
DR. B.R. SARANGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
