In a Writ O.P., the petitioner sought to quash promotion orders of others and claim promotion. The Court, without expressing opinion on merits, directed the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation within three months.
Directing opposite party no.3 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner under Annexure-3 within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OA) No.984 OF 2013
Ramakrishna Mohanty
Petitioner
Mr. K.C. Sahu, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha & Ors. ….. Opposite parties
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
23.02.2022
Order No. 1
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2
Alok
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the representation filed by the petitioner under Annexure-3 must be considered within a stipulated time.
RAMAKRISHNA MOHANTY
STATE OF ODISHA
DR. B.R. SARANGI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
