Writ petitioner counsel stated that the matter was already disposed of by the tribunal via an order dated 05.12.2012. The court held there was no need to pass any order and disposed of the petition on that ground.
No specific relief granted; petition disposed of due to prior disposal by the tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC (OA) No. 1089 of 2012
Muralidhar Naik …. Petitioner Mr. U.C. Mohapatra, Adv.
-Versus -
State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
Order No.
01
ORDER
24.02.2022
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that this writ
petition has already disposed of by the tribunal vide order no.4
dated 05.12.2012.
3. In view of the above submission, there is no need of
passing any order in this writ petition.
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi)
Judge
Ashok
Page 1 of 1
Muralidhar Naik
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
