Mamata Swain v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed by Mamata Swain against Union Bank of India was dismissed as not pressed after withdrawal was sought by the petitioner's advocate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.39879 of 2021 (Through hybrid mode)
Mamata Swain
Mr. S.K. Mohanty, Advocate Mr. Jayadeba Behera, Advocate
-versus-
Union Bank of India and another
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. Amitav Tripathy, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
Order No.
9.
ORDER 15.07.2022
1. Mr. Mohanty, learned advocate appears and hands up
withdrawal memo signed by learned advocate engaged by petitioner. By the memo, permission has been sought to withdraw as not press, the writ petition.
2. Mr. Tripathy, learned advocate appears on behalf of the bank.
3. The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(Arindam Sinha)
Judge
Sks
Page 1 of 1
Mamata Swain
Union Bank of India
Arindam Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court