The writ petition seeking direction to the bank to accept OTS balance with interest was disposed of by directing the petitioner to approach the concerned branch with his offer for the bank's consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.4018 Of 2022 (Through hybrid mode)
Ajaya Kumar Sahoo
Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Sarangi, Senior Advocate
-versus-
State Bank of India
…. Opposite Party Mr. Himanshu Pattnaik, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
Order No.
3.
ORDER 14.07.2022
1. Mr. Sarangi, learned senior advocate appears on behalf of petitioner. He submits, his client has sought direction upon the bank to accept balance of the One Time Settlement (OTS) amount with interest as per annexure-2 in the petition. Mr. Pattnaik, learned advocate appears on behalf of the bank and submits, petitioner may approach his client directly with his prayer.
2. Petitioner is directed to approach concerned Branch of the bank with his offer, either in terms of annexure-2 in the writ petition or made afresh. In event petitioner approaches within two weeks from date, the bank will consider and dispose of petitioner’s prayer.
3. The writ petition is disposed of.
(Arindam Sinha)
Judge
Sks
Page 1 of 1
Ajaya Kumar Sahoo
State Bank of India
Arindam Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
