The High Court recalled an Order dated 18.04.2023 due to an apparent mistake where the application had already been disposed of earlier.
Recalled the order dated 18.04.2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.4020 of 2022 (Through hybrid mode)
Rajalaxmi Pradhan
Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Sarangi, Sr. Advocate
-versus-
Bank of India, BBSR
…. Opposite Party
Mr. B.K. Padhi, Advocate
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
ORDER 25.04.2023 I.A. no.3966 of 2023
Order No.
5. 1. Mr. Sarangi, learned senior advocate appears on behalf of review applicant and submits, his client be allowed to withdraw the application with liberty to file another on better particulars.
2. Mr. Padhi, learned advocate appears and submits, his senior is engaged on behalf of the bank.
3. The writ petition was disposed of by order dated 14th July, 2022. Review applicant had by I.A. no.13658 of 2022, applied for modification of the order, to extend time to pay under the One Time Settlement (OTS), by 30th September, 2022 on payment of extra charge of interest at 10% per annum. The bank was represented at moving of the application on 12th October, 2022. Upon hearing, the
Page 1 of 1
// 2 //
application stood disposed of. Subsequent thereto order dated 18th April, 2023 was made, obviously on mistake by not noticing that the application had already been disposed of by order dated 12th October, 2022.
4. In the circumstances, order dated 18th April, 2023 is recalled.
5. The writ file and application be sent to the ‘disposed of’
Record Section.
Sks
(Arindam Sinha)
Judge
Page 2 of 2
Rajalaxmi Pradhan
Bank of India, BBSR
Arindam Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
