Chandrabhanu Nayak v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition, the High Court of Orissa disposed of the matter after receiving instructions that a school was almost complete, holding no further directions were called for.
In a writ petition, the High Court of Orissa disposed of the matter after receiving instructions that a school was almost complete, holding no further directions were called for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.35272 of 2020
Chandrabhanu Nayak and others …. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Baral, Advocate -versus…. Union of India and others Opp. Parties Mr. P.K. Parhi, ASGI Mr. J. Katikia, AGA
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK
Order No.
ORDER 19.04.2022 1. Mr. Katikia, learned AGA has placed before the Court written instructions received on 8th April, 2022 from the Tahasil Office, Mathili stating that Eklabya Model Residential School, Mendukuli of Mathili Block is almost complete. 2. In that view of the matter, no further directions are called for. 3. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge
KC Bisoi
Chandrabhanu Nayak and others
Union of India and others
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court