State v. Akhaya Ku.Mallick
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Orissa dismissed a writ appeal for non-prosecution due to eleven years' delay in filing the certified copy of the impugned order.
What did the court decide?
Writ appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.A. No. 143 of 2011
…. State of Orissa Appellant
Mr. P.K. Muduli, Addl. Government Advocate -versus-
…. Akhaya Kumar Mallick and another Respondents
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
Order No. 19.04.2022
02. 1. Despite eleven years having elapsed since the filing of the
appeal, even the certified copy of the impugned order has not been
filed and the defect remains uncured.
2. Consequently, the writ appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R. K. Pattanaik)
Judge
S. Behera
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State of Orissa
- respondent
Akhaya Kumar Mallick and another
Coram
R. K. Pattanaik
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court