State v. Krushna Ch.Sahoo
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Orissa dismissed a writ appeal for the State of Orissa against a certified copy not filed for over eleven years, citing non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Writ appeal dismissed for non-prosecution due to failure to file certified copy of impugned order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.A. No.182 of 2011
…. State of Orissa Appellant Mr. P.K. Muduli, A.G.A.
-versus-
Krushna Chandra Sahoo and another
…. Respondents
CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R. K. PATTANAIK
ORDER 18.04.2022 Order No. 02. 1. For over eleven years now, even the certified copy of the impugned order has not been filed and defect has not been removed.
- The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(R. K. Pattanaik)
Judge
S.K. Guin
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State of Orissa
- respondent
Krushna Chandra Sahoo
- respondent
another
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court