The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking foreclosure of a contract due to failure of special e-Tender conditions. It directed the authorities to decide the pending application within three months without issuing notice.
A direction to opposite party no.3 to decide the pending application for foreclosure within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No. 35174 of 2021
SSG Mining (JV)
Petitioner
Mr. A. Patnaik, Advocate
Vs.
The Chairman-cum-MD, MCL, Sambalpur & others.
….. Opposite party
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
ORDER
06.01.2022
Order No.
03
conditions of the e-Tender notice dated 07.11.2019, is pending, let opposite party no.3 take a decision on the same, as expeditiously as possible, within a period of three months from the date of communication of the order.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Arun
(S.K. PANIGRAHI)
JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner raises a valid claim for foreclosure of the contract due to failure of special conditions of e-Tender.
Whether to dispose of the writ petition without issuing notice to opposite parties.
SSG Mining (JV)
The Chairman-cum-MD, MCL, Sambalpur & others
DR. B.R. SARANGI
S.K. PANIGRAHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
