This matter was heard in hybrid mode. The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the writ petition had become infructuous by efflux of time. The Court disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
Writ petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 9699 of 2005
M/s. Ravi Crushing Industries (Pvt.) Ltd.
….. Petitioner
Mr. T.K. Patnaik, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha & Ors.
….. Opposite parties
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
ORDER
05.01.2022
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
3
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the
writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time.
3. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed
of as infructuous.
Alok
……………………...
( DR. B.R. SARANGI )
JUDGE
…………….…………..…….
( S.K. PANIGRAHI )
JUDGE
M/s. Ravi Crushing Industries (Pvt.) Ltd.
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
S.K. Panigrahi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
